Ron 97 Vs Ron 95

As for the jettas the ron 95 car used 17 505 litres averaging 13 52 km per litre or 7 40 l 100 km compared to the ron 97 test car s 17 857 litres 13 26 km per litre or 7 54 l 100 km. While we drained the myvi completely off fuel there is a possibility of old fuel left in the fuel lines but this should not affect the test results significantly. The conclusion from this test is using ron 95 is 3 sen.

unsur tradisi dalam perlembagaan unsur unsur patriotisme dan harapan universiti awam terbaik di malaysia undang undang tubuh kerajaan terengganu university college of yayasan pahang usaha jana sdn bhd universiti teknikal malaysia melaka utem universiti malaysia pahang pekan

The fact that ron95 fuel is sold at cheaper prices does not mean that ron95 fuel is of lesser quality instead it is a type of fuel that caters for specific engine requirements just like how the ron97 caters for higher performance car s engine.

Ron 97 vs ron 95. 1 ron95 gives you more mileage surprisingly and contrary to popular belief our dyno test revealed that ron95 actually gives you about 9 4 more mileage than ron97. It is a matter of using the right fuel for the right car. If you are concerned about the cost involved over the long term.

Technically putting ron97 fuel into your car does not give you more mileages than ron95 fuel if your car does not require ron 97 fuel. Meanwhile the ron 97 saga recorded a fuel consumption of 7 1 litres per 100 km or 14 04 km l costing rm31 82 in total or 18 sen per km. Between the three different types of fuel neither one is more superior than the other.

Ron 95 vs ron 97 vs diesel cars in malaysia.

Source : pinterest.com